✦ LIBER ✦

The criterion validity of different versions of the General Health Questionnaire among non-psychiatric inpatients

✍ Scribed by Fabian Friedrich; Rainer Alexandrowicz; Norbert Benda; Gero Cerny; Johannes Wancata

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 166 KB
Volume: 46
Category: Article
ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-010-0229-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Validity of the Chinese version of the G

Validity of the Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire

✍ Dr. Daniel T. L. Shek 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 581 KB

Reliability and validity of the Cambodia

Reliability and validity of the Cambodian version of the 28-item General Health Questionnaire

✍ P. Cheung; G. Spears 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 506 KB

The Chinese General Health Questionnaire

The Chinese General Health Questionnaire in a psychiatric setting: the development of the Chinese scaled version

✍ D. W. Chan 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 722 KB

Screening for depression: Clinical valid

Screening for depression: Clinical validation of geriatricians’ diagnosis, The Brief Assessment Schedule Depression Cards and the 5-item version of the Symptom Check List among non-demented geriatric inpatients

✍ Boon Loke; Frank Nicklason; Peter Burvill 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 419 KB 👁 2 views

In this study, two screening instruments for depression and geriatricians' diagnosis were compared against the Geriatric Mental State Schedule (GMS), a standardized semi-structured psychiatric interview. The Brief Assessment Schedule Depression Cards (BASDEC) achieved 91% sensitivity and 85% specifi