๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital

โœ Scribed by V. W. Vanek; C. C. Bourguet


Publisher
Springer
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
899 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
0930-2794

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This retrospective study reviewed the hospital and professional costs, charges, and reimbursements for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lap chole) and open cholecystectomy (open chole) and compared the two procedures. There was no significant difference in hospital costs between lap and open chole procedures; however, there were marked differences in the categories of costs for each procedure. The mean total (hospital and professional) charge was 8% greater for lap chole. The mean total (hospital and professional) reimbursement for patients with private insurance was 23% greater for lap chole, but no significant difference was seen for patients on Medicare or Medicaid. Lap chole patients returned to work 11 days sooner than open chole patients; this can result in a 69% decrease in short-term disability costs to employers. The clinical variables that significantly affect total charges and reimbursement are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The costs and effects of open versus lap
โœ Prof. Dr. K. Kesteloot; F. Penninckx ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 728 KB

The costs and effects of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomies are compared, from the point of view of hospitals and patients, for a consecutive series of 47 patients undergoing a cholecystectorny in the University Hospital Gasthuisberg, in Belgium. For the patients the laparoscopic technique