𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The correlation of core replacement energies with nonbonding s electron density

✍ Scribed by William L. Jolly; Christina Gin; David B. Adams


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
456 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2614

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


IicccivzJ 18 NovcmSer 1476

Core replacement energies are calcu!atcd for nitrogen and oxygen III various gaseous cations from accurate core binding encrgres and thermodyrwnic data. Thr vducs for a given clement differ in some cases by much more than the experimental errors. These chemical shifts in mre rcpkcement CncrbT wn be rationalized by rccognizmg that they ;ue equal to the shifts in the energy of transferring ZIR electron from ;I core Jevci to a nucleus. As expected, relativcIy endothermic core replacement energies arc found for atoms which hale a hgh density oi nonbonding valence s electrons.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Accurate calculation of core-electron bi
✍ Delano P. Chong πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 332 KB

Using a basis set of atomic natural orbitals of valence triple-zeta plus double polarization quality, the core-electron binding energies (CEBEs) ofHF, H20, N2 and CO were computed by the deMon density-functional program with a combined functional of Becke's exchange (B88 ) with Perdew's correlation

Correlation of core electron binding ene
✍ M.E. Schwartz πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1970 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 459 KB

Binding energy shiffts spanning a range of 9 eV for carbon 1s electrons in twenty different environments have been correlated wivith the properly calculated average potential at the carbon nucleus due to the ocher nuclei (with nuclear charges appropriately reduced by their core electro\_m) and the v

Fast density matrix-based partitioning o
✍ Diederik Vanfleteren; Dieter Ghillemijn; Dimitri Van Neck; Patrick Bultinck; Mic πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 162 KB

## Abstract For the Hirshfeld‐I atom in the molecule (AIM) model, associated single‐atom energies and interaction energies at the Hartree–Fock level are efficiently determined in one‐electron Hilbert space. In contrast to most other approaches, the energy terms are fully consistent with the partiti