The European Parliament in the Contested Union provides a systematic assessment of the real influence of the European Parliament (EP) in policy-making. Ten years after the coming into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, which significantly empowered Europeâs only directly elected institution, the cont
The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union
â Scribed by Vigjilenca Abazi, Johan Adriaensen, Thomas Christiansen
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan
- Year
- 2020
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 250
- Series
- European Administrative Governance
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
⊠Synopsis
This book examines the position and role of expertise in European policy-making and governance. At a time when the very notion of expertise and expert advice is increasingly losing authority, the book addresses these challenges by empirically examining specific administrative processes and institutional designs in the European Union. The first part of the volume theorizes expertise and its contestation by examining accounts of the legitimate institutional design of knowledge production processes and exploring the theoretical links of Europeanisation and expertise. The second part of the book delves into empirical institutionalist accounts of expertise and maps the role of experts in a variety of EU institutions but also explains the implications when EU bodies themselves are in an âexpertâ position, such as agencies. The book offers insights into how individual experts deal with the challenge of producing reports that will be heard by policy-makers, while at the same time preserving their independence. Broadening its scope, the book then expands the analysis to the role of advisory committees in light of the shift from a reliance primarily on in-house expertise to including more external experts in advisory groups in the European Commission and European Parliament as well as at the European External Action. In the third part, the book opens the lens to developments beyond the EU by taking into account two highly pertinent fields: climate change and trade. These fields are highly complex, fast-developing, and politicised issues, and the book engages with them in order to provide an outside-in perspective on expertise.
⊠Table of Contents
Preface
Contents
Notes on Contributors
Abbreviations
List of Figures
List of Tables
1 Introduction
Introduction
Understanding âContestationâ of Expertise
The Notion of âContestationâ and the Approach of This Book
Actors, Aspects and Logics of Contestation
A Culmination of Critiques
Expertise and Its Contestation in the European Union
Technocracy, Expertise and Legitimacy
Contestation of Expertise in EU Policy-Making
Outline of the Book
References
2 Conceptualising the Role of Expertise in EU Policy-Making
Introduction
Science and Technology Studies Approaches to the Study of Expertise
Cognitive Science Approaches to the Study of Expertise
Decision-Making Theory Approaches to the Study of Expertise
Political Science Approaches to the Study of Expertise
Applying Social Psychology to the Study of Expert Groups
Developing an Information-Processing Approach to the Study of Expertise
Conclusion
References
3 The Europeanization of National Knowledge Regimes
Introduction
Europeanization
Knowledge Regimes
The Europeanization of Knowledge Regimes
The EU Knowledge Regime
The Interaction Between Knowledge Regimes at Different Governance Levels
Institutional Sites of Adaptation
Conclusion
References
4 Winning Hearts, Losing Minds: Politicisation and the Contestation of Expertise in the Context of TTIP Negotiations
Introduction
Expertise and Policymaking
Lobbying and Expertise
Inside and Outside Strategies: Complementary or Contradictory?
NGOsâ Role in Trade Policy in the EU
NGOsâ Campaigns Against TTIP
Structural Contestation: Transparency in TTIP
ISDS: Politicisation and Technical Expertise
Contesting the Legitimacy of NGOs
Anti-TTIP Campaigns, Politicisation and the Contestation of Expertise
Conclusion
Bibilography
5 The European Commissionâs Expert Groups: Adapting to the Contestation of Expertise
Introduction
State of the Art and Research Design
The (Changing) Landscape of the European Commission Expert Groups
The Commissionâs Register of Expert Groups as an Instrument of Transparency and Accountability in EU Expert Governance
A Better Balance in the Representation of Corporate and Civil Society Interests?
Adaptation Pathways at the Level of Individual Expert Groups
Case study of the High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance
Case Study of the Industrial Emissions Directive Article 13 Forum
High Contestation and Strategic Use of Expertise
Conclusion
List of Conducted Interviews
6 The Role of Expertise in the EUâs Emerging Diplomatic System
Introduction
Conceptualising Expertise in the EEAS
Expertise and the EEAS: The Case of the Asia Pacific Department
The EEAS: Some Introductory Observations
Sources of Expertise
Lessons Learned
Conclusion
References
7 Climate Science in the Courts
Introduction
A Legal Perspective on the IPCC
A Hybrid Global Administrative Law Construct: How to Hold It to Account?
Scientific (Un)Certainty in IPCC Reports and Policy Decisions
Case Law Regarding the Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Role of Climate Science
Methodological Observation: The Specific Characteristics of Jurisdictions Matter
The US: Science as a Starting Point for Judging the Need for Regulating Greenhouse Gases
Europe: Litigation at EU Level and at National Level
The European Union: Approving Climate Action Without Referring to Science
The Netherlands: Translation of a Scientific Emission Scenario into a Binding Norm
Reflection
Climate Science and the Judiciary: Towards a Shift of Power?
Towards Activist Case Law?
To What Extent Are External Circumstances Influential, Such as Media Coverage?
The Rebound Effect of Using IPCC Reports in the Courtroom
Conclusion
References
8 Judicial Review of Science-Based Measures Under WTO Law
Introduction
Science and the WTO Disciplines
Science in the Practice of the WTO Dispute Settlement Bodies
Dealing with Scientific Uncertainties
Insufficiency of Scientific Evidence
Applicable Standard of Review
Conclusions
References
9 Contesting Concentrated Scientific Power: The Case of the European Commissionâs Chief Scientific Adviser
Introduction
The Politicisation of Scientific Expertise
The Establishment and Dissolution of the Chief Scientific Adviser
From CSA to SAM
Conclusion
References
10 Conclusion: The Contestation of Expertise in the EU
Introduction
Patterns in the Contestation of Expertise in the European Union
Consequences of the Contestation of Expertise
Re-thinking the Role of Expertise in a Post-Factual World
References
Index
đ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The European Union's foreign policy and its international role are increasingly being contested both globally and at home. At the global level, a growing number of states are now challenging the Western-led liberal order defended by the EU. Large as well as smaller states are vying for more leeway t
The trend toward privatization, which began with privatization experiments in the UK under Margaret Thatcher and the deregulation of the telecommunications sector in the United States, has attracted the attention of policymakers over the past two decades. Privatization is broadly supported by most a
Ilina Cenevska's new book explores the unique nature of the Euratom Community within the overall European Union context, looking at the ways in which the Euratom system corresponds to and interacts with the Union framework.