𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The contemporary role of F-wave studies: F-wave studies: Limitations

✍ Scribed by Michael H. Rivner


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
79 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Additional possible roles for F waves in clinical practice are in the process of development. Analyses of F waves may be the best method for motor unit estimates. 17 Information from F waves about central nervous system function is increasing. This includes evidence from F waves for physiological compensation following central as well as peripheral injury. 4

CONCLUSION

Those performing electrodiagnostic medicine consultations should feel comfortable using F waves. Fwave studies should be performed when they will be helpful. For some, this will be infrequent. Others may find F-wave studies regularly of value. It is incorrect to argue, for example, that F waves are of no benefit in radiculopathies and therefore should not be reimbursed. At the same time, it is irresponsible to argue that F waves are needed in all such patients. The question is not one of dogma but of thought. A considered approach to the use of F waves will benefit all.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The contemporary role of F-wave studies:
✍ Morris A. Fisher πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 68 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

lect patients with clinical problems in which F waves may be useful. To summarize, if F-wave studies are to be used to screen for radiculopathy, their sensitivity must be improved. First, F waves should be performed only when it is likely that the lesion involves the innervation of the muscle studi

Sample size and the study of F waves
✍ JoΓ£o Antonio Maciel Nobrega; Gilberto Mastrocola Manzano; Neil Ferreira Novo; Pa πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 70 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Ulnar nerve F waves were studied in 23 healthy volunteers and 27 diabetic patients. Latencies and chronodispersion were analyzed in each group for different sample sizes. Significant differences were not detected with the different sample sizes for mean latencies, with samples above 16 stimuli or 10