This article considers a generalization of the classical structural flexibility matrix. It expands on previous papers by taking a deeper look at computational considerations at the substructure level. Direct or indirect computation of flexibilities as ''influence coefficients'' has traditionally req
The construction of free–free flexibility matrices as generalized stiffness inverses
✍ Scribed by C.A. Felippa; K.C. Park; M.R. Justino Filho
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 451 KB
- Volume
- 68
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0045-7949
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
We present generalizations of the classical structural ¯exibility matrix. Direct or indirect computation of ¯exibilities as `in¯uence coecients' has traditionally required pre-removal of rigid body modes by imposing appropriate support conditions. Here the ¯exibility of an individual element or substructure is directly obtained as a particular generalized inverse of the free±free stiness matrix. This entity is called a free±free ¯exibility matrix. It preserves exactly the rigid body modes. The de®nition is element independent. It only involves access to the stiness generated by a standard ®nite element program as well as a separate geometric construction of the rigid body modes. With this information, the computation of the free±free ¯exibility can be done by solving linear equations and does not require the solution of an eigenvalue problem or performing a singular value decomposition. Flexibility expressions for symmetric and unsymmetric free±free stinesses are studied. For the unsymmetric case two ¯exibilities, one preserving the Penrose conditions and the other the spectral properties, are examined. The two versions coalesce for symmetric matrices.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES