๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The choices, choosing model of quality of life: linkages to a science base

โœ Scribed by Barry J. Gurland; Roni V. Gurland


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
77 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

A previous paper began with a critical review of current models and measures of quality of life and then proposed criteria for judging the relative merits of alternative models: preference was given to finding a model with explicit mechanisms, linkages to a science base, a means of identifying deficits amenable to rational restorative interventions, and with embedded values of the whole person. A conjectured model, based on the processes of accessing choices and choosing among them, matched the proposed criteria. The choices and choosing (cโ€“c) process is an evolved adaptive mechanism dedicated to the pursuit of quality of life, driven by specific biological and psychological systems, and influenced also by social and environmental forces.

Objective

In this paper the cโ€c model is examined for its potential to strengthen the science base for the field of quality of life and thus to unify many approaches to concept and measurement.

Conclusions

A third paper in this set will lay out a guide to applying the cโ€“c model in evaluating impairments of quality of life and will tie this evaluation to corresponding interventions aimed at relieving restrictions or distortions of the cโ€“c process; thus helping people to preserve and improve their quality of life. The fourth paper will demonstrate empirical analyses of the relationship between health imposed restrictions of options for living and conventional indicators of diminished quality of life. Copyright ยฉ 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The choices, choosing model of quality o
โœ Barry J. Gurland; Roni V. Gurland ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 71 KB

## Abstract ## Background A previous paper began with a critical review of current models and measures of quality of life and then proposed criteria for judging the relative merits of alternative models: preference was given to finding a model with explicit mechanisms, linkages to a science base,

Erratum: The choices, choosing model of
โœ Barry J. Gurland; Roni V. Gurland ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 22 KB

## Abstract International Journal of Geriatic Psychiatry 2009; 24: 90โ€“95 DOI: 10.1002/gps.2110 If has come to our attention that this Research Article was published with an incorrect SUMMARY. We now publish below, the entire SUMMARY as first intended.

Predictors of quality of life: A model b
โœ Erik D. Masthoff; Fons J. Trompenaars; Guus L. Van Heck; Helen J. Michielsen; Pa ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 230 KB
A model of the data (life) cycles with a
โœ A.V. Levitin; T.C. Redman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 682 KB

The purpose of the paper is to present a new model of the data l~fe-cycle. Such a model is needed to clarify activities involving data, from its creation through use, and to establish the relation-Ships of these activities to one another. The proposed model features four principal data cycles: the a