๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as an in vivo model for photodynamic therapy

โœ Scribed by V. Gottfried; E.S. Lindenbaum; S. Kimel

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
260 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1011-1344

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Photodynamic parameters in the chick cho
Photodynamic parameters in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) bioassay for topically applied photosensitizers
โœ Marie J. Hammer-Wilson; Lori Akian; Jenny Espinoza; Sol Kimel; Michael W. Berns ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 414 KB

The relative efficacy of Photofrin w -based photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been compared with that of the second-generation photosensitizers 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), sulfonated chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine (AlPcS n ), benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA), and lutetium texaphyrin

The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a
The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novelin vivo model for the testing of biomaterials
โœ Valdes, T.I. ;Kreutzer, D. ;Moussy, F. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 956 KB

Current in vivo models for testing biomaterials are time and labor intensive as well as expensive. This article describes a new approach for testing biomaterials in vivo using the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the developing chicken embryo, as an alternative to the traditional mammalian models.

Demonstration of synergistic effects of
Demonstration of synergistic effects of hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy using the chick chorioallantoic membrane model
โœ S. Kimel; L. O. Svaasand; M. Hammer-Wilson; V. Gottfried; S. Cheng; E. Svaasand; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 783 KB

The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model was used to study vascular effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and hyperthermia (HPT) and the synergism of these modalities. The CAM is a convenient medium for monitoring the modifications of the vasculature. It is possible to view the CAM and to exam

Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as
Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novelin vivo model for testing biosensors
โœ Valdes, T. I. ;Klueh, U. ;Kreutzer, D. ;Moussy, F. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 835 KB

## Abstract A major problem with implantable sensors is their short __in vivo__ lifetime, due to strong tissue reactions (i.e., inflammation and fibrosis) caused by the implant and the failure of sensor components. The tissue reactions to the sensor, the biocompatibility of components, and the func