The popular and successful rhetorical textbooks produced by the 18th century Scottish philosophical tradition, such as George Campbell's The Philosophy of Rhetoric (1776), Hugh Blair's Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (1783), and Alexander Bain's English Composition and Rhetoric (1877) have b
The Center Must Not Hold: White Women Philosophers on the Whiteness of Philosophy
β Scribed by George Yancy (ed.)
- Publisher
- Lexington Books
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 299
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The Center Must Not Hold: White Women Philosophers on the Whiteness of Philosophy functions as a textual site where white women philosophers engage boldly in critical acts of exploring ways of naming and disrupting whiteness in terms of how it has defined the conceptual field of philosophy. Within this text, white women philosophers critique the field of philosophy for its complicity with whiteness as a structure of power, as normative, and as hegemonic. In this way, the authority of whiteness to define what is philosophically worthy is seen as reinforcing forms of philosophical narcissism and hegemony. Challenging the whiteness of philosophy in terms of its hubristic tendencies, white women philosophers within this text assert their alliance with people of color who have been both marginalized within the field of philosophy and have had their philosophical and intellectual concerns and traditions dismissed as particularistic. Aware that feminist praxis does not necessarily lead to anti-racist praxis, the white women philosophers within this text refuse to telescope as a site of critical inquiry one site of hegemony (sexism) over another (racism). As such, the white women philosophers within this text are conscious of the ways in which they are implicated in perpetuating whiteness as a site of power within the domain of philosophy. Framed within a philosophical space that values the multiplicity of philosophical voices, and driven by a feminist framework that valorizes de-centering locations of hegemony, interdisciplinary dialogue, and transformative praxis, The Center Must Not Hold refuses to allow the white center of philosophy to masquerade as universal and given. The text de-centers various epistemic and value orders that are predicated upon maintaining the center of philosophy as white. The white women philosophers who contribute to this text explore ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, taste, the nature of a dilemma, questions of the secularity of philosophy, perception, discipline-based
β¦ Table of Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright Page
Dedication Page
Table of Contents
Foreword
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Troublemaking Allies
Chapter 1: White Ignorance and the Denials of Complicity: On the Possibility of Doing Philosophy in Good Faith
Chapter 2: Reading Black Philosophers in Chronological Order
Chapter 3: On Intersectionality and the Whiteness of Feminist Philosophy
Chapter 4: The Man of Culture: The Civilized and the Barbarian in Western Philosophy
Chapter 5: Whiteness and Rationality: Feminist Dialogue on Race in Academic Institutional spaces
Chapter 6: Appropriate Subjects: Whiteness and the Discipline of Philosophy
Chapter 7: Color in the Theory of Colors? Or: Are Philosophers' Colors All White?
Chapter 8: The Secularity of Philosophy: Race, Religion, and the Silence of Exclusion
Chapter 9: Philosophy's Whiteness and the Loss of Wisdom
Chapter 10: Against the Whiteness of Ethics: Dilemmatizing as a Critical Approach
Chapter 11: The Whiteness of Anti-Racist White Philosophical Address
Chapter 12: Colonial Practices/Colonial Identities: All the Women are Still White
Chapter 13: Is Philosophy Anything if it Isn't White?
Index
About the Contributors
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Though it is not uncommon for historians to have something to say concerning philosophical strands in Jeffersonβs thought, that something is usually insubstantialβoften misleadingly soβor inchoate. Overall, precious little has been said. The significance of the man and the richness of his thought de
PIERIDES III, Series Editors: Myrto Garani and David KonstanDespite the Romans' reputation for being disdainful of abstract speculation, Latin poetry from its very beginning was deeply permeated by Greek philosophy. Philosophical elements and commonplaces have been identified and appreciated in a wi
"I wrote <i>The Philosophy of Disenchantment</i>, which is, I think, the gloomiest and worst book ever published. Out of sheer laziness, I then produced a history of atheism, <i>The Anatomy of Negation</i>, which has been honored by international dislike. Need I state that of all my children it is t