✦ LIBER ✦

The biotech directive: does Europe need a new draft?

Book ID: 107927071
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 173 KB
Volume: 18
Category: Article
ISSN: 0172-2190
DOI: 10.1016/0172-2190(96)85019-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

E-commerce — France: France: a new draft

E-commerce — France: France: a new draft implementation of the electronic commerce directive under consideration

✍ Nancy Muenchinger; Denton Salès 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 38 KB

EC DRAFT PATENT DIRECTIVE: “I WOULDN’T S

EC DRAFT PATENT DIRECTIVE: “I WOULDN’T START FROM HERE IF I WERE YOU” — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN EUROPE AND THE PROPOSED NEW DIRECTIVE ON COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED INVENTIONS

✍ Trevor Cook 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

Everyone agrees that computer software should be protected by intellectual property. But there is no consensus as to how much protection there should be, and by what means it should be given. Copyright seems to protect too little, patents are thought to protect too much, and we have gone too far alo

Culture in the Age of Convergence: The N

Culture in the Age of Convergence: The Need for a New Policy Stance and Platform for Europe

✍ Colin Mercer 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 84 KB

Education in Pharmaceutical Sciences Nee

Education in Pharmaceutical Sciences Needs a Brand New Direction to Meet the Challenges of Drug Research and Development

✍ Abu T. M. Serajuddin 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 289 KB

„European Social Policy: Meeting the Nee

„European Social Policy: Meeting the Needs of a New Europe“ Second ESPAnet Annual Conference University of Oxford, September 9–11 2004

📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 VS-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 78 KB

Preambles and resolutions relating to re

Preambles and resolutions relating to revision of U. S. copyright and patent laws**This draft was prepared by Dr. F. E. Stewart, chairman of the Committee on Patents and Trade-marks, A. Ph A., for Dr. S. Solis Cohen, Chairman of the Committee on Scope, U. S. P. IX. It was also submitted in the report of the Committee on Patents and Trade Marks, of the Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ Association of Philadelphia, composed of Ernest T. Trigg (President Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce), Charles A. Wagner and Dr. F. E. Stewart, and approved. The matter in italics is suggested for revising the present U. S. Copyright and Patent Laws, and the subject is submitted for study by the members of the American Pharmaceutical Association, preparatory to its discussion at the next annual convention. The Committee received instructions at the last meeting to proceed with the revision, and the Chairman is desirous that the subject be carefully considered from every viewpoint.The Committee believes that all ambiguity now existing in the law should be removed in the revision. Provision should also be made in the law so that the inventor of a new process can secure a royalty from the original patentee. Attention is again directed that matter in italics embody the suggestions of the Committee for additions to the copyright, patent and trademark laws.—Editor.

📂 Article 📅 1917 🏛 Elsevier ⚖ 998 KB 👁 1 views