## BACKGROUND. Although all men age ΓΊ50 years are at an increased risk for the development of prostate carcinoma, 2 major factors increase this risk: family history and race. This article outlines the influence of family history on the risk of prostate carcinoma and current understanding of factor
The biologic dilemma of early carcinoma of the prostate
β Scribed by Andrew C. von Eschenbach
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 414 KB
- Volume
- 78
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
BACKGROUND.
The clinician has long been challenged by the diversity in clinical expression of carcinoma of the prostate. On one end of the spectrum is a disease that is phenotypically malignant but biologically not virulent. It is the prostate carcinoma that males die with rather than of. On the other end of the spectrum, there is a carcinoma of the prostate that is relentless and virulent, and has been resistant to our intervention efforts. Although all males are known to be at risk for the occurrence of carcinoma of the prostate, there is no means at present to predict the type and behavior of the disease they will experience. This is the conundrum faced upon recognition of premalignant and early microscopic disease.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: It is not yet known whether screening for the detection of early prostate carcinoma will reduce mortality rates. however, data are available to assess intermediate outcomes from screening, including the performance characteristics of the screening tests and shifts in disease stage.
## ARC'INORIA of the prostate most often begins between the agcs of 60 and 70, and has no recognized connection with senile enlargement or with prostatitis. Microscopically the growth is usually of scirrhous typc, but may also be an adenocarcsinoma with cubical or columnar cells. I n thc common s