✦ LIBER ✦

The Axiom of Countable Choice and Pointfree Topology

✍ Scribed by Bernhard Banaschewski

Book ID: 110299393
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 113 KB
Volume: 9
Category: Article
ISSN: 0927-2852
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011284016682

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Pointfree Aspects of the T d Axiom of Cl

Pointfree Aspects of the T d Axiom of Classical Topology

✍ Banaschewski, Bernhard; Pultr, Ale[sbreve] 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 230 KB

On Lindel¨of uniform frames and the axio

On Lindel¨of uniform frames and the axiom of countable choice

✍ Banaschewski, B.; Walters-Wayland, J.L. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 134 KB

Disasters in topology without the axiom

Disasters in topology without the axiom of choice

✍ Kyriakos Keremedis 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 82 KB

TWO TOPOLOGICAL EQUIVALENTS OF THE AXIOM

TWO TOPOLOGICAL EQUIVALENTS OF THE AXIOM OF CHOICE

✍ Eric Schechter; E. Schechter 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 159 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract We show that the Axiom of Choice is equivalent to each of the following statements: (i) A product of closures of subsets of topological spaces is equal to the closure of their product (in the product topology); (ii) A product of complete uniform spaces is complete.

Topological properties of a certain bico

Topological properties of a certain bicompact extension satisfying the first countability axiom

✍ O. V. Ivanov 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 397 KB

A Remark on Ascending Chain Conditions,

A Remark on Ascending Chain Conditions, the Countable Axiom of Choice and the Principle of Dependent Choices

✍ Karl-Heinz Diener 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 370 KB

## Abstract It is easy to prove in ZF^−^ (= Zermelo‐Fraenkel set theory without the axioms of choice and foundation) that a relation __R__ satisfies the maximal condition if and only if its transitive hull __R__\* does; equivalently: __R__ is well‐founded if and only if __R__\* is. We will show in