β Scribed by Gerald N. Grob
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
During the 1960s there was a sustained attack on psychiatric legitimacy. Thomas S. Szasz was the most vituperative and bestβknown critic, but he was by no means alone. Individuals and groups from both extremes of the political spectrum were united in their belief that psychiatry was not a legitimate medical specialty, but one that was devoted to protecting its authority as well as enforcing societal norms associated with an unjust society. The attack on psychiatry, of course, did not occur in a vacuum; numerous social and intellectual currents played major roles. To comprehend such attacks and their consequences requires an understanding of the larger societal context as well as the changes that transformed psychiatry in the postβWorld War II years. Β© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This paper critically examines the perceived threat of βclimate refugeesβ and βclimate conflictβ. It locates the ideological roots of these concepts in development theories and policy narratives about demographically induced migration, environmental refugees and environmental security.
## Abstract The increasingly important economic role of supply chain management provides the backcloth against which this article examines what contribution the function can make to environmental protection. Theoretical perspectives on greener supply are developed and then tested against a sample o