The atheoretical nature of the national science education standards

✍ Scribed by Thomas W. Shiland

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1998
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 23 KB
• Volume: 82
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0097-0352
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199809)82:5<615::aid-sce5>3.0.co;2-c

✦ Synopsis

This article argues that the National Science Education Standards is an atheoretical document because it fails to: (1) prescribe specific scientific theories worth knowing; (2) define the role of scientific theories in science literacy; and (3) outline a theoretical framework to conduct research on the inquiry method. The respective consequences of this atheoretical approach are: (1) a distortion of scientific knowledge; (2) an overconfidence in the ability of students to construct logical explanations for natural phenomena, that is, to invent theories; (3) a slowing of the advance of science education by not providing a theoretical framework in which to do research. An alternative definition of science literacy is suggested which states that science literacy is the ability to use the commonly accepted theories of science to explain everyday phenomena.