✦ LIBER ✦

The assessment of communication skills in palliative medicine: a comparison of the scores of examiners and simulated patients

✍ Scribed by I G Finlay; N C H Stott; P Kinnersky

Book ID: 115080391
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 530 KB
Volume: 29
Category: Article
ISSN: 0308-0110
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02866.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Use of simulated patients to assess the

Use of simulated patients to assess the clinical and communication skills of community pharmacists

✍ Weiss, Marjorie C. ;Booth, Anneka ;Jones, Bethan ;Ramjeet, Sarah ;Wong, Eva 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer 🌐 Dutch ⚖ 184 KB

Simulated patients and the assessment of

Simulated patients and the assessment of medical students' interpersonal skills

✍ R. W. SANSON-FISHER; A. D. POOLE 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 420 KB

Using simulators to aid the teaching of

Using simulators to aid the teaching of communication skills in cancer and palliative care

✍ Ann Faulkner 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 432 KB

Comparison of two instruments for assess

Comparison of two instruments for assessing communication skills in a general practice objective structured clinical examination

✍ Marc Van Nuland; Wim Van Den Noortgate; Jan Degryse; Jo Goedhuys 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB

Assessment of a matched-pair instrument

Assessment of a matched-pair instrument to examine doctor−patient communication skills in practising doctors

✍ Craig Campbell; Jocelyn Lockyer; Toni Laidlaw; Heather MacLeod 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

A large-scale study of the reliabilities

A large-scale study of the reliabilities of checklist scores and ratings of interpersonal and communication skills evaluated on a standardized-patient examination

✍ D. S. Cohen; J. A. Colliver; R. S. Robbs; M. H. Swartz 📂 Article 📅 1996-1997 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 338 KB 👁 1 views

Checklists and rating scales are both used for assessing examinees in standardized-patient (SP) examinations. A common presumption, is that checklists are more objective than and hence superior to rating scales with respect to psychometric properties such as reliability. Recently, this presumption h