The “art” of medicine and the “smokescreen” of the randomized trial off-label use of vascular devices
✍ Scribed by Gary M. Ansel; Michael R. Jaff
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 59 KB
- Volume
- 72
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1522-1946
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Once a device is approved for sale in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it can legally be used by doctors to treat any condition a physician determines is medically appropriate. Based on postmarket published data and physician procedural experience, this may even become the standard of care when an alternative device either does not exist or is inferior in performance, even before FDA approval. This right of physicians to practice medicine without FDA approval is Federal law. The off‐label use of medical devices for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease has recently become the latest target by groups with interests that have little to do with patient care. This interference has begun to negatively impact the latitude necessary for physicians to best treat their patients. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract **Objective:** To compare the effectiveness of accessing the common femoral artery (CFA) using fluoroscopic guidance (FG) versus traditional anatomic landmark guidance (TALG) during cardiac catheterization and to determine the effect of the two modalities on the appropriateness for use