Background. Our aim was to investigate the ways in which surgeons who perform head and neck ablative procedures on a regular basis define margins, how they use frozen sections to evaluate margins, and the effect of chemoradiation on determining tumor margins. Methods. A custom-designed questionnair
The American Society of Anesthesiologists' class as a comorbidity index in a cohort of head and neck cancer surgical patients
✍ Scribed by Britt C. Reid; Anthony J. Alberg; Ann C. Klassen; Wayne M. Koch; Jonathan M. Samet
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 127 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
- DOI
- 10.1002/hed.1143
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background
We assessed the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) class, as a measure of comorbidity in comparison to the commonly used Charlson index for prognostic ability in a HNCA population.
Methods
Proportional hazards methods were applied to head and neck cancer patients whose treatment included surgery by the Johns Hopkins Otolaryngology service (n = 388).
Results
The Charlson index and ASA class were modestly correlated (Spearman 0.36, p < .001). Compared with patients with ASA class 1 or 2, those with ASA class 3 or 4 had a two‐fold elevated mortality rate (Relative Hazard (RH) = 2.00, 95% CI, 1.38–2.89). This association was stronger than observed for a Charlson index score of 1 or more compared with 0 (RH = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.17–2.17). Both the Charlson index and ASA class adjusted RHs displayed dose‐response patterns (p value for trend < .001).
Conclusions
Compared with the Charlson index, the ASA class had comparable if not greater prognostic ability for mortality in this elderly HNCA population. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 985–994, 2001.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES