## Abstract Retinoic acid inducible gene‐I (RIG‐I) functions as the first line of defense against viral infection by sensing dsRNA and inducing type I interferon (IFN) production. The expression of RIG‐I itself is induced by IFN‐α/β and dsRNA. To comprehend the molecular mechanism of expression reg
The ambiguous role of interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) immunoexpression in myelodysplastic syndrome
✍ Scribed by Ronald Feitosa Pinheiro; Konradin Metze; Maria Regina Régis Silva; Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaille
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 161 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0145-2126
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Recent investigations postulate a participation of the interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) in the development of myelodysplasia (MDS) and in the pathogenesis of autoimmune manifestations (AIMs) in patients with this disease. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the IRF-1 immunoexpression in MDS patients with or without AIMs and to investigate its prognostic relevance. Fifty consecutive MDS patients entered this prospective study. There was no difference in overall survival between patients with or without autoimmune manifestations. In a multivariate Cox regression "IRF-1 expression in immature myeloid cells", Hb, and the IPSS risk group stratification were independent prognostic parameters. Bootstrap resampling confirmed these data. In a multivariate logistic regression older patients with, higher platelet count and increased IRF-1 expression had a higher risk to develop autoimmune-like phenomena. Thus our study shows that IRF-1 plays an ambiguous role in MDS patients. Whereas high levels of IRF-1 in myeloid cells are a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival, they increase the probability of the manifestation of autoimmune phenomena, with a diminished quality of life.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract IRF‐1 and IRF‐2 expression was determined by real‐time PCR in 138 ovarian cancer samples and 30 healthy ovarian biopsies and was correlated with the expression of other relevant immunologic parameters and common clinicopathologic variables. Regulation of IRF‐1 and IRF‐2 was evaluated by