𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The additivity of NMR carbon–carbon spin–spin coupling constants

✍ Scribed by James L. Marshall; Larry G. Faehl; Richard Kattner


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1979
Tongue
English
Weight
594 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
0749-1581

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Fluorene‐9‐^13^C, fluorenone‐9‐^13^C, acenaphthenone‐11‐^13^C, acenaphthenone‐12‐^13^C, 1‐methylcyclopentanol‐1‐^13^C and 1‐methylcyclopentene‐1‐^13^C were synthesized to obtain J(CC) values between the natural carbons and the labeled carbons. Each of these compounds possessed at least one asymmetric dual‐path coupling, i.e., coupling between the labeled carbon and another carbon via simultaneous two‐ and three‐bonded coupling paths. Model ^13^C‐labeled compounds were synthesized where necessary to give expected values of the constituent mono‐path couplings. Values of these dual‐path couplings (^2+3^)J suggested that the observed value is the (at least approximate) algebraic sum of the two constituent J values.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


One-bond carbon–carbon spin–spin couplin
✍ Poul E. Hansen; Victor Wray 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 161 KB

## Abstract A summary of all the one‐bond carbon–carbon spin–spin coupling constants, Known up to the beginning of 1980, is given in diagrammatic form.

A note on the calculations of spin–spin
✍ Tun Khin; G. A. Webb 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 285 KB

## Abstract Sum‐over‐states perturbation and self‐consistent perturbation calculations of ^__n__^__J__(CC) using standard INDO parameters are discussed. Calculated values of ^1^__J__(OC) for acetone are reported. In general it seems that the sum‐over‐states calculations are the more reliable. The i