๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Tests for parental imprinting in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

โœ Scribed by Haack, Herbert ;Hodgkin, Jonathan


Publisher
Springer
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
387 KB
Volume
228
Category
Article
ISSN
0026-8925

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The mutation him-6 (e1423) leads to generalized chromosomal nondisjunction during meiosis in oogenesis and spermatogenesis of C. elegans. As a result, gametes nullisomic or disomic for each of the six chromosomes occur at appreciable frequency. Crosses utilizing marked him-6 strains were used to generate and identify exceptional euploid progeny which had received both homologues of a marked autosome either from the male parent or from the female parent. Examples of all ten possible exceptions were identified and found to be viable and fertile. These results (together with previous data for the X chromosome) indicate that major chromosomal imprinting effects do not occur during gametogenesis in this organism.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A uniform genetic nomenclature for the n
โœ Horvitz, H. Robert ;Brenner, Sydney ;Hodgkin, Jonathan ;Herman, Robert K. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 419 KB

A uniform system of genetic nomenclature for the nematode Caenorhabditis eIegans is described. Convenient ways are specified to designate genes, mutations and strains, and to attempt to avoid name duplications. An extensive genetic characterization of the small soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Errata to: xenobiotic detoxification in
โœ Tim H. Lindblom; Allyn K. Dodd ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) ๐ŸŒ English โš– 35 KB

In our review of the use of C. elegans as a biosensor (Lindblom and Dodd, 2006), we regrettably misrepresented the work of Dr. Cristina Lagido and colleagues when we inadvertently compared their use of bacterial and eukaryotic luciferase enzymes in C. elegans. We stated on page 726 that One study ut