TESTING FOR INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION EQUIVALENCE BASED ON THE PROPORTION OF SIMILAR RESPONSES
β Scribed by DROR M. ROM; EUNHEE HWANG
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 988 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This paper focuses on the classical problem of comparison of treatment effects. We show that we can base a simple and intuitive approach to comparison of two treatments on the proportion of similar responses. This approach is equivalent to the standard comparison of the treatment means in the normal case with equal known variances, but is quite different in other cases. Our approach applies under two different settings: testing a null hypothesis of no treatment difference against an alternative hypothesis of a difference, and testing the null hypothesis of at least a specific difference against an alternative hypothesis of equivalence. We develop our approach both for parallel groups (independent samples), and cross-over (paired samples) studies. The two situations give rise to the known concepts of population and individual equivalence. We present a graphical procedure to supplement the method.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second most common cancer in Europe. Cumulative relative survival curves for both cancer of the colon and cancer of the rectum generally plateau after βΌ6β8 years. When this occurs, βpopulationβ or βstatisticalβ cure is
Equivalence trials aim to demonstrate that two treatments do not differ by more than a prespecified clinically irrelevant amount. We consider the problem when equivalence is defined in terms of the ratio of population means and the original (untransformed) data are normally distributed. Application