𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

TESTING FOR INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION EQUIVALENCE BASED ON THE PROPORTION OF SIMILAR RESPONSES

✍ Scribed by DROR M. ROM; EUNHEE HWANG


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
988 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6715

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This paper focuses on the classical problem of comparison of treatment effects. We show that we can base a simple and intuitive approach to comparison of two treatments on the proportion of similar responses. This approach is equivalent to the standard comparison of the treatment means in the normal case with equal known variances, but is quite different in other cases. Our approach applies under two different settings: testing a null hypothesis of no treatment difference against an alternative hypothesis of a difference, and testing the null hypothesis of at least a specific difference against an alternative hypothesis of equivalence. We develop our approach both for parallel groups (independent samples), and cross-over (paired samples) studies. The two situations give rise to the known concepts of population and individual equivalence. We present a graphical procedure to supplement the method.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Temporal trends in the proportion cured
✍ Paul C. Lambert; Paul W. Dickman; Pia Γ–sterlund; Therese Andersson; Risto Sankil πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 418 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second most common cancer in Europe. Cumulative relative survival curves for both cancer of the colon and cancer of the rectum generally plateau after ∼6–8 years. When this occurs, β€œpopulation” or β€œstatistical” cure is

Sample size determination for proving eq
✍ Dieter Hauschke; Meinhard Kieser; Edgar Diletti; Martin Burke πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 137 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Equivalence trials aim to demonstrate that two treatments do not differ by more than a prespecified clinically irrelevant amount. We consider the problem when equivalence is defined in terms of the ratio of population means and the original (untransformed) data are normally distributed. Application