We consider tests for the equality of prediction mean squared errors and for forecast encompassing. It is shown that, if forecast errors exhibit ARCH, size distortions are induced in the usual tests. Adjusted test statistics are suggested to alleviate this problem.
Testing for ARCH in the presence of additive outliers
✍ Scribed by Dick Van Dijk; Philip Hans Franses; André Lucas
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 279 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0883-7252
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In this paper we investigate the properties of the Lagrange Multiplier [LM] test for autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) and generalized ARCH (GARCH) in the presence of additive outliers (AOs). We show analytically that both the asymptotic size and power are adversely aected if AOs are neglected: the test rejects the null hypothesis of homoscedasticity too often when it is in fact true, while the test has diculty detecting genuine GARCH eects. Several Monte Carlo experiments show that these phenomena occur in small samples as well. We design and implement a robust test, which has better size and power properties than the conventional test in the presence of AOs. We apply the tests to a number of US macroeconomic time series, which illustrates the dangers involved when nonrobust tests for ARCH are routinely applied as diagnostic tests for misspeci®cation.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A kinetic model of the reactions involved in the removal of aqueous aromatic compounds from wastewater by horseradish peroxidase (HRP, also known as hydrogen peroxide oxidoreductase, EC 1.11.1.7) has been calibrated and veriÐed for phenol removal in the presence and absence of excess polyethylene gl