Testing alternative explanations of phantom decoy effects
โ Scribed by Jonathan C. Pettibone; Douglas H. Wedell
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 484 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3257
- DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.557
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Firms' boundary choices have undergone careful examination in recent years, particularly in information services. While transaction cost economics provides a widely tested explanation for boundary choice, more recent theoretical work advances competing knowledge-based and measurement cost explanatio
Given a choice set of two alternatives, the addition of a third alternative that is clearly inferior to one of the existing alternatives (but not the other), can result in a shift of preference to the alternative that dominates the new alternative. The basic asymmetrically dominated effect, as it is
## Abstract Organizations using personality tests in management development programs must choose from an array of personality tests and formats. The most common formats are normative (for example, Likert type) and forced choice. Although there are some potential advantages to using the forcedโchoic