✦ LIBER ✦

Tenth Meeting of BEES (The British Epidermo-Epidemiology Society) - Programme and Abstracts

Book ID: 104459669
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 153 KB
Volume: 145
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-0963
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.01452.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Programme and Abstracts of Sixth Meeting

Programme and Abstracts of Sixth Meeting of The British Epidermo-Epidemiology Society (BEES)

📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 334 KB

The Fifth Meeting of the BEES (British E

The Fifth Meeting of the BEES (British Epidermo-Epidemiology Society), 12 January 1996, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham

📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 419 KB

The Fourth Meeting of the BEES (British

The Fourth Meeting of the BEES (British Epidermo-Epidemiology Society), 20 January 1995, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham

📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 43 KB

Abstracts from the Tenth Annual Meeting

Abstracts from the Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society

📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 110 KB

The classic TDT is a matched chi-square but the same data can be analyzed using a Maximum-Likelihood statistic (ML-TDT) which was shown to be more powerful. We propose an extension of the ML-TDT to quantitative phenotypes, denoted as ML-QTDT. As already proposed for linkage analysis (Alcais and Abel

Abstracts from the Tenth Annual Meeting

Abstracts from the Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society

📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

Abstracts from the Tenth Annual Meeting

Abstracts from the Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Genetic Epidemiology Society

📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

We developed a method to identify candidate regions in the search for disease susceptibility loci, based on contrasting the level of haplotype diversity of a sample of 'affected' chromosomes with that of an equal number of 'unaffected' chromosomes coming from the same population. Our approach involv