Temporary portocaval shunt in orthotopic liver transplantation: Need for a standardized approach?
โ Scribed by Diego Davila; Adam Bartlett; Nigel Heaton
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 84 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.21603
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Maintenance of portal and systemic venous return during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation (LT) improves hemodynamic stability. With the piggyback technique, caval return is maintained; however, temporary clamping of the portal vein is still necessary. The use of a temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) has been proposed to minimize the effect of portal venous interruption. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is evidence to support the routine use of a TPCS in LT. An electronic search of the literature from 1963 to 2007 was performed. A total of 4386 articles were identified, of which 8 met all the criteria and were included in the study. Because of the variability in reporting and the small number of studies, statistical comparison was not possible; however, a trend toward a shorter operative time, less blood product transfusion, and maintenance of higher mean arterial pressures during portal vein clamping was seen in patients with a TPCS. In conclusion, the available evidence, albeit scarce, supports the use of a TPCS in patients undergoing LT. A prospective randomized study of patients most likely to benefit from a TPCS is necessary to substantiate these findings.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In general, for a liver transplantation to be successful, the graft size should cover 30%-40% of the expected liver volume or 0.8%-1.0% of the body weight of the recipient. 1,2 However, small-for-size-graft syndrome depends not only on the graft size but also on the recipient's preoperative conditio