<span>Music offers a new insight into human cognition. The musical play with sounds in time, in which we share feelings, gestures and narratives, has fascinated people from all times and cultures. <br> The author studies this semiotic behavior in the light of research from a number of sources. Being
Telos and Object: The relation between sign and object as a teleological relation in the semiotics of Charles S. Peirce (European Semiotics / Sémiotiques Européennes)
✍ Scribed by Luca Russo
- Publisher
- Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
- Year
- 2017
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 336
- Edition
- New
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The semiotics of Charles S. Peirce is conceived as an essential part of a comprehensive philosophical outlook. The study of signs is carried on for its bearing on the knowledge of reality; therefore the relation of signs to objects is the core concern of Peirce’s semiotics. This study looks at this question on the background of Peirce’s philosophical system, individuating in the theories of reality and of knowledge the key issues which allow a philosophically grounded definition of the sign-object relation. The concepts of teleology and of final cause reveal themselves to be the essential conception which emerges from these two issues. The underlying teleological tendencies in the use of signs justify their gnoseological reliableness.
✦ Table of Contents
Cover
Contents
Introduction
1. Aims and Conclusions
2. Necessary Presuppositions to reach the Conclusion
3. Semiotic Theory and Philosophical Background: The Boundary of the Present Work
4. Temporal Development of Peirce’s Ideas
5. The Standing of the Present Work in the Context of the Research about Peirce
Part I: The Philosophical Foundations of Peirce’s Semiotics
1. Anti-Cartesianism: Every Knowledge is essentially mediated Knowledge
2. Reality, Knowledge and the Establishment of Opinions
3. The Pragmatic Maxim
4. The Question of Universals and the Reality of Generals
5. The Categories and Phenomenology
6. Logic and its Importance for Semiotics
Part II: The System of Peirce’s Semiotics
Chapter 1: The Foundations of Peirce’s Semiotics
1.1. On a New List of Categories: The Cradle of Semiotics
1.2. Semiotics after the New List: Opening New Paths
Chapter 2: The Triadic Structure of Signs
2.1. The Triadic Structure of Signs in General
2.2. Some Particular Aspects of Semiotic Structure: The Ground and the Purpose
2.2.1. Purpose and the Semiotic Triad
2.2.2. The Ground and the Semiotic Triad
Chapter 3: The Essence of the Triadic Structure of Signs: The Role of the Interpretant
3.1. Why does the Semiotic Structure require three Relates? A Justification of the Interpretant
3.2. Interpretant, Purpose and Habit of Action: A Sufficient Explanation?
3.3. Peirce’s Statements about The Interpretant
3.4. An Attempt at a Theoretical Justification
3.4.1. Semiosis as “Standing for” and the Interpretant as a Criterion for Substitution
3.4.2. Why the Criterion for Substitution must be expressed as a Third Correlate: The Meta-theoretical and Theoretical Advantages of Peirce’s Approach
3.4.3. The Function of the Interpretant is to select a Referential Relation: A Comparison with Putnam
3.4.4. Interpretants and Admissible Outcomes of Semiotic Events
3.4.5. Interpretation as Grasping a Potential Outcome Which is essentially dependent on the Sign
3.4.6. Interpretation and Habit-Change again: The Conditions under which a Habit-Change Can be the Interpretant of a Sign are essentially implied by the Sign
3.4.7. Interpretation, Selection of a Ground, Potential Outcomes and Semantic: Does this Account of Interpretant work also for Semantic Issues?
3.4.8. Final Remarks
3.5. Conclusion
Chapter 4: Interlude: The Classification of Signs in Peirce’s Later Semiotic
Chapter 5: Icons in Peirce’s later Semiotics
5.1. Nature and Functions of Icons
5.1.1. Nature and Functions of Icons: General Consideration
5.1.2. Difficulties with the Concept of Icon
5.1.3. Underdetermination as an essential Feature of Icons. The Class of possible Objects and the Self-Reference of Icons
5.1.4. Again on the Difficulties with the Concept of Icons: Kinds of Icon and the Problem of Conventions
5.2. Two Views on Peirce’s Icons
5.2.1. Iconicity as a Non-Distinction between the Sign and the Object
5.2.2. Advantages and Flaws of this Interpretation
5.2.3. The Issue of Reference and the Attempt to reduce Icons to Symbols
5.3. Conclusion
Chapter 6: The Index
6.1. Nature and Functions of Indices
6.2. The Index as Instruction
6.3. Indices and Indexical Terms
6.4. Indexical Terms and descriptive Content: Indices and Icons
6.5. Indices and Sense: Traceability as the Main Feature of Indices
6.6. Indices and the actual World: ‘Blind’ Secondness and the Role of Purpositive Processes
Chapter 7: Symbols
7.1. The Nature of Symbols
7.1.1. A new Conception of the Symbolic Ground as ‘Consisting in a Regularity’
7.1.2. The Symbols as distinguished from Icons and Indices
7.1.3. Symbols from a phenomenological Point of View
7.2. Rhematic Symbols
7.2.1. The Nature of Rhematic Symbols
7.2.2. Rhematic Symbol, Icon and Index
7.3. Dicent Symbols
7.3.1. Dicisigns and their Components: The Symbolic Element
7.3.2. Dicisigns and their Components: The Indexical Element
7.3.3. The Fact as Object of the Dicisign
7.3.4. Another Approach to the Object of Dicisigns
7.4. Argument
7.4.1. The Nature of Arguments
7.4.2. Arguments and Dicisigns
Chapter 8: Immediate and Dynamical Object
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Immediate Object and Dynamical Object
8.2.1. The Meaning of the Distinction
8.2.2. Two Conceptions of Reality, and the Place of the Dynamical Object in the Semiotic Process
8.2.3. Dynamical Object and Perception
8.2.4. Dynamical Object and Collateral Experience
8.2.5. Dynamical Objects which are not Existing Individuals
8.3. Kinds of Object: Some Remarks
8.4. Conclusion
Chapter 9: The Different Forms of Interpretant
9.1. Introduction
9.2. The Kinds of Interpretant
9.3. Further Questions; Interpretants and the Teleological Nature of Signs
9.3.1. Purposes and Fields of Interpretability
9.3.2. Horizontal and Vertical Coordination of Interpretants
9.3.3. Ultimate Interpretant and the Ultimate Normative Role of the Reference to an Object
Bibliography
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>The French mathematician René Thom (Fields medal 1958) died in 2002. In this volume his contributions to biology, semiotics and linguistics are discussed by a group of scholars who have continued his work and have shaped the new paradigm of dynamic semiotics and linguistics. Thom’s heritage is
<span>Of all the tasks you perform, perhaps none is more consequential for the performance of other tasks than paying attention. When you attend, you perceive. When you attend and perceive, you remember. When you attend, perceive, and remember, you learn. When you learn, you have the option of actin
<span>This book – written in collaboration with René Doursat, director of the Complex Systems Institute, Paris – adds a new dimension to Cognitive Grammars. It provides a rigorous, operational mathematical foundation, which draws from topology, geometry and dynamical systems to model iconic «image-s
Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs examines Peirce’s philosophy and semiotic thought from a European perspective, comparing the American’s unique views with a wide variety of work by thinkers from the ancients to moderns. Parts I and II deal with the philosophical paradigms which are at the roo
[Note: Picture of Peirce available]Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of SignsEssays in Comparative SemioticsGérard DeledallePeirce’s semiotics and metaphysics compared to the thought of other leading philosophers. "This is essential reading for anyone who wants to find common ground between the best of