## Abstract Understanding the role of negative affectivity (NA) in relations between job stressors and resultant strains has been a major source of research interest in the organizational literature for almost two decades. In this study, we propose a contingency approach, whereby the role of NA dep
Team effectiveness under stress: a structural contingency approach
โ Scribed by Anat Drach-Zahavy; Anat Freund
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 331 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.430
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
To examine whether working under stressful circumstances restricts or enhances team effectiveness, a structural contingency model for team effectiveness was tested by focusing on job structuring (mechanistic/organic structuring) as a key factor, which interacts with qualitative and quantitative stress on team attitude (team commitment) and outcomes (team effectiveness). Findings from 73 primary care teams indicated that mechanistic structuring for teams working under quantitative stress was positively associated with team commitment, which in turn fostered team effectiveness, whereas organic structuring for working under qualitative stress improved team effectiveness. Furthermore, team commitment mediated the relationships between stress and structuring and team effectiveness. These findings support a structural contingency model for improving team effectiveness under stress. Copyright ยฉ 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Accelerated life testing (ALT) is concerned with subjecting items to a series of stresses at several levels higher than those experienced under normal conditions so as to obtain the lifetime distribution of items under normal levels. A parametric approach to this problem requires two assumptions. Fi
Traumatic stresses are becoming an increasing reality on college campuses. Unfortunately, many campuses are ill-prepared to respond professionally to the needs of victims and covictims. Even more scarce are proactive prevention programs. The problems experienced by victims of post-traumatic stress d