✦ LIBER ✦

Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions

✍ Scribed by Jason L. Hicks; Richard L. Marsh; Gabriel I. Cook

Book ID: 108181223
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 189 KB
Volume: 53
Category: Article
ISSN: 0749-596X
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.001

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Implementation intentions about nonfocal

Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks

✍ J. Thadeus Meeks; Richard L. Marsh 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Guilford Publishing Inc 🌐 English ⚖ 212 KB

Is task interference in event-based pros

Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?

✍ Shayne Loft; Rebecca Kearney; Roger Remington 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Psychonomic Society Publications 🌐 English ⚖ 139 KB

Memory for intentions in amnestic mild c

Memory for intentions in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Time- and event-based prospective memory

✍ TROYER, ANGELA K.; MURPHY, KELLY J. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Cambridge University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 75 KB

Process-based and code-based interferenc

Process-based and code-based interference in dual-task performance

✍ Iring Koch; Pierre Jolicoeur 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Guilford Publishing Inc 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB

The Influence of the Stroop Interference

The Influence of the Stroop Interference Effect on an Event-based Prospective Memory Task in Alzheimer's Disease Patients

✍ Shutaro Nakaaki; Hama Watanabe; Hikaru Nakamura; Shinichi Yoshida; Teruo Matui; 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 652 KB

Associating a time-based prospective mem

Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion

✍ Gabriel I. Cook; Richard L. Marsh; Jason L. Hicks 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 135 KB

## Abstract Three experiments investigated time‐based prospective memory defined here as remembering to fulfil an intention during a later window of time. When people associated the response window with a future context, time‐based responding was better if that context expectation was correct as co