✦ LIBER ✦

Task complexity effect on vocal reaction time in aged speakers

✍ Scribed by Michael S. Fozo; Ben C. Watson

Book ID: 117595440
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 974 KB
Volume: 12
Category: Article
ISSN: 0892-1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80049-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Effect of Tones on Vocal Attack Time in

Effect of Tones on Vocal Attack Time in Cantonese Speakers

✍ Ma, Estella P.-M.; Baken, R.J.; Roark, Rick M.; Li, P.-M. 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 911 KB

Effects of a reaction time task on postu

Effects of a reaction time task on postural control in humans

✍ Nicolas Vuillerme; Vincent Nougier; Normand Teasdale 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB

Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on pr

Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task

✍ M. Gómez-Beldarrain; J. C. García-Moncó; B. Rubio; A. Pascual-Leone 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 469 KB

Effect of a vocal choice reaction time t

Effect of a vocal choice reaction time task on the kinematics of the first recovery step after a sudden underfoot perturbation during gait

✍ Joseph O. Nnodim; Hogene Kim; James A. Ashton-Miller 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 860 KB

The effect of warning stimulus modality

The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks

✍ Ottmar V. Lipp; David A.T. Siddle; Patricia J. Dall 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 186 KB

The effects of nitrous oxide on the audi

The effects of nitrous oxide on the auditory evoked response in a reaction time task

✍ M. J. Jarvis; M. H. Lader 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 478 KB

Reaction times and evoked electroenccphalographie responses to tone stimuli were measured using a LINC-8 computer on-line. The effects on these measures of inhaling 10, 20 and 30~ nitrous oxide in oxygen were compared with those of pure oxygen in twelve normal subjects. Each subject gave 50 response