𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium

✦ LIBER ✦

Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing primary versus delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions

✍ Scribed by Singh, Prashant; Bhangu, Aneel; Lundy, Jonathan; Bowley, Douglas

Book ID: 122161183
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2013
Tongue: English
Weight: 63 KB
Volume: 11
Category: Article
ISSN: 1743-9191
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.678

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Ran

Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Primary vs Delayed Primary Skin Closure in Contaminated and Dirty Abdominal Incisions

✍ Bhangu, Aneel; Singh, Prashant; Lundy, Jonathan; Bowley, Douglas M. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 American Medical Association 🌐 English ⚖ 403 KB

Review finds primary stenting lowers the

Review finds primary stenting lowers the risk of reinfarction and revascularisation, but does not improve survival compared to balloon angioplasty: Abstracted from: Nordmann AJ, Hengstler P, Harr T, et al. Clinical outcomes of primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004; 116: 253–62.

📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB