In this paper, Lanczos and Arnoldi reduction methods as the special cases of the generalized Hessenberg method are brieΒ―y reviewed. Attention is paid to the eect of symmetry of matrices on the behaviour of the reduction schemes, such as serious numerical breakdown. Based on the summation decompositi
Symmetry Reduction of Fourier Kernels
β Scribed by J.H Samson; G.A Evans
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 253 KB
- Volume
- 142
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9991
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Fourier transforms of functions of several variables invariant under certain symmetry groups are studied, with particular reference to functions f (x 1 β’ β’ β’ x N ) of N three-component vectors invariant under rigid rotations. Here we use symmetry to enhance the efficiency of evaluation of the integrals. The Fourier transform can be written as an integral
exp(i A zz (2u -1)) du, a function of the eigenvalues of the dyadic A = Ν N i=1 k i x i . For N = 1 the familiar Hankel transform is recovered. For N = 2 the kernel reduces to a single integral of elementary functions, equal to the local spin-flip propagator in a one-dimensional tight-binding antiferromagnet. A variety of forms is given, and useful asymptotic forms are found in various limits. Recent numerical methods for the evaluation of irregular oscillatory integrals are applied to the kernel in the N = 2 case.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Local coordinate systems are chosen for each quadruple of atoms relative to a four-center integral, in order to avoid linear combinations of orbitals when symmetry operations perform on an orbital. This choice can utilize the complete molecular symmetry to attain the optimal number of symmetry-uniqu
Autonomous systems of ordinary differential equations can be rewritten as systems of first order ordinary differential equations and one of the dependent variables chosen as a new independent variable. Some of the variables are eliminated to give a mixed system of first and second order equations fo
In Figure on page 940 the coupling constant 3 J(H,C) between C at Ξ΄ Ο 137.3 and H at Ξ΄ Ο 6.64 was erroneously marked as a 3 J(H,H) coupling constant; the correct version is printed below.