The susceptibility of starch-filled and starch-based polyethylenes to oxygen in water and air was analyzed and compared. LDPE containing 7.7% starch and a prooxidant formulation in the form of masterbatch (LDPE-MB) was compared to pure LDPE, LDPE with 7.7% starch (LDPE-starch), and a blend with 70% starch and 30% ethylene maleic anhydride (starch-EMA). Thermal ageing at 80ะC in air and water was followed by monitoring the molecular weight changes, the formation of carbonyl groups, and degradation products by SEC, FTIR, and GC-MS. It was demonstrated that LDPE-MB was the most susceptible material to degradation in both environments, although the degradation was faster in air than in water. The slower degradation in water is explained by a deactivation or leaching out of the pro-oxidant during the aging. The degradation of pure LDPE and starch-EMA is faster in water than in air. LDPEstarch was the only material that did not degrade during 11 weeks in water at 80ะC. The addition of starch to LDPE made this material even more stable than pure LDPE to aging in water. The molecular weight distribution of LDPE-MB narrowed during aging in air. In water, on the other hand, the MWD of LDPE-MB, LDPE, and LDPEstarch broadened. The lower oxygen concentration in water increases the probability for molecular enlargement reactions in comparison to the case in air. Mono-and dicarboxylic acids were the major products identified in both environments. Ketoacids were formed in both air and water, but ketones and hydrocarbons were only identified after aging in air. Either these products are not formed or they remain in the polymer matrix rather than migrate out into the water. Lactic acid and 2-furancarboxaldehyde were only identified in the starch-EMA material degraded in water at 80ะC. LDPE, LDPEstarch, and starch-EMA did not form any degradation products during 11 weeks at 80ะC in air in agreement with the neglible molecular weight changes observed. แญง 1997