๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: A disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database

โœ Scribed by Mark S. Roberts; Derek C. Angus; Cindy L. Bryce; Zdenek Valenta; Lisa Weissfeld


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
218 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Our goal was to describe disease-specific survival and the clinical variables that predict survival in a large national cohort of adult liver transplant recipients. Data on 17,044 adult patients who received an initial orthotopic liver transplant between 1990 and 1996 with follow-up through 1999 was obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Disease-specific Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox Proportional Hazards models were estimated, and differences in the clinical characteristics of patients at the time of transplantation by disease were examined. Overall posttransplant survival currently exceeds 85% in the first year and is approaching 75% at 5 years. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival is improved for recipients who are younger, female, and in better clinical condition. Survival is a function of disease and level of illness: cancer, fulminant liver failure, alcoholic liver disease, and the hepatitidies have the poorest prognosis, while primary billiary cirrohsis and sclerosing cholangitis have the best. Recipients who were outpatients before transplantation have longer survival than those transplanted from the hospital or intensive care unit. Although the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was designed to predict pretransplant survival, patients with higher MELD scores have poorer posttransplant survival, but the MELD score is less predictive than the specific disease. Differences in disease-specific survival are partially explained by differences in disease severity at the time of transplantation. In conclusion, Disease-specific survival models indicate that there remains tremendous variability in survival as a function of underlying liver disease. However, a significant portion of the difference in survival between dis-eases arises from differences in clinical characteristics at the time of transplantation. (


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of disease severity and sur
โœ David A. Stell; Vivian C. McAlister; Douglas Thorburn ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 74 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The severity of preoperative liver disease influences the outcome of liver transplantation, is commonly used to determine priority on liver transplant waiting lists, and may differ between countries with different rates of liver disease and organ allocation systems. We compared the relative severity

Outcome of liver transplantation for dru
โœ Ayse L. Mindikoglu; Laurence S. Magder; Arie Regev ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 279 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an uncommon but potentially lethal drug-related adverse effect that often leads to liver transplantation (LT) or death. A retrospective cohort study was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files. Recipients who un

High rate of unemployment after liver tr
โœ Amina Huda; Robert Newcomer; Charlene Harrington; Mary G. Blegen; Emmet B. Keeff ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 133 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The goal of liver transplantation (LT) is to maximize the length and quality of a patient's life and facilitate his or her return to full productivity. The aims of this study were (1) to use the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data set to determine the proportions of recipients who were empl

Optimizing staging for hepatocellular ca
โœ Richard B. Freeman; Abigail Mithoefer; Robin Ruthazer; Khanh Nguyen; Anthony Sch ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 182 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Assignment of liver allocation priority for hepatocellular carcinoma is predicated on accurate imaging staging. We analyzed radiographically defined stage (radiologic stage [RS]) at listing and most recent extension and pathologic stage (PS) data from 789 liver transplant recipients for whom no pret

Patient and graft survival in hepatitis
โœ Mark W. Russo; Joseph Galanko; Kimberly Beavers; Michael W. Fried; Roshan Shrest ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 91 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

End stage liver disease from chronic hepatitis C is the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Small studies suggest that recurrent hepatitis C may be more common and occur earlier after living donor liver transplantation compared to deceased donor liver transplantation.

ABO-incompatible deceased donor liver tr
โœ Zoe A. Stewart; Jayme E. Locke; Robert A. Montgomery; Andrew L. Singer; Andrew M ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 360 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

In the United States, ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ILT) is limited to emergent situations when ABO-compatible liver transplantation (CLT) is unavailable. We analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing database of ILT performed from 1990-2006 to assess ILT outcomes for infant (0-1 years;