Survey data as coincident or leading indicators
✍ Scribed by Cecilia Frale; Massimiliano Marcellino; Gian Luigi Mazzi; Tommaso Proietti
- Book ID
- 102215369
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 411 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6693
- DOI
- 10.1002/for.1142
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In this paper we propose a monthly measure for the euro area gross domestic product (GDP) based on a small‐scale factor model for mixed‐frequency data, featuring two factors: the first is driven by hard data, whereas the second captures the contribution of survey variables as coincident indicators. Within this framework we evaluate both the in‐sample contribution of the second survey‐based factor, and the short‐term forecasting performance of the model in a pseudo‐real‐time experiment. We find that the survey‐based factor plays a significant role for two components of GDP: industrial value added and exports. Moreover, the two‐factor model outperforms in terms of out‐of‐sample forecasting accuracy the traditional autoregressive distributed lags (ADL) specifications and the single‐factor model, with few exceptions. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A lack of annually accessible morbidity information for small geographical areas in England and Wales means that health studies are often restricted to using decennial, self‐reported census measures. Administrative data on health‐related benefit claims, in the form of Incapacity Benefit
## A reminder of what the molecular data indicate, and why they can't be ignored or dismissed Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -or so I was taught as a student. But it sometimes appears as if papers making sensational claims can get published with rather less than compelling evi