𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Surface-phase separation of PEO-containing biodegradable PLLA blends and block copolymers

✍ Scribed by Joo-Woon Lee; Euh Duck Jeong; Eun Jeong Cho; Joseph A. Gardella Jr.; Wesley Hicks Jr.; Robert Hard; Frank V. Bright


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
604 KB
Volume
255
Category
Article
ISSN
0169-4332

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) is a neutral, highly biocompatible, and pharmacologically inactive water-soluble polymer [1]. The physicochemical incorporation of PEO into biodegradable poly(Llactic acid) (PLLA)-based drug delivery implant systems would be expected to improve the interfacial biocompatibility of these polymeric devices. Blend matrices of PEO and relatively hydrophobic PLLA or PEO-b-PLLA block copolymers should improve the three dimensional stability and the biological activity of watersoluble macromolecular drugs such as proteins or enzymes in the delivery systems, which are incorporated in the matrix [2] for two reasons: first, if surface-segregated PEO in the aqueous environment provides a diffusive hydrophilic layer [3] facilitating the interaction between cells and polymeric biodevices, and secondly, if hydrophilic PEO segments in the bulk protect water-soluble drugs from hydrophobic polymers in the form [4] of a micelle or encapsulation.

Two model systems of PEO-containing polymer systems are considered in the present study as candidates for seeding proteinbased drugs into a PLLA matrix. One approach is to use PLLA blend matrices with PEO-b-poly(propylene oxide) (PPO)-b-PEO triblock copolymers (Pluronics 1 , BASF Corp.), Pluronics 1 exhibit a wide range of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity as a function of PEO/PPO ratio [5]. The blend concept is based on the assumption that blends can exhibit advantageous physicomechanical properties that each individual polymer does not have [6,7]. The other model system involves PLLA-b-PEO diblock and PLLA-b-PEO-b-PLLA triblock copolymers [8]. Recently, these nonionic amphiphilic block copolymers have been studied as a new biodegradable hydrogel in the application of injectable drug delivery systems due to the novel thermosensitive sol-gel transition [4,9,10]. The chemistry in bulk of two polymer systems above has been extensively studied. However, few attempts have been made for the surface char-


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Monte Carlo simulation of phase separati
✍ Yuliang Yang; Jianming Lu; Dong Yan; Jiandong Ding πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 638 KB

## Abstract The Monte Carlo method has been used to simulate the phase separations of block copolymers and of corresponding blends with very high concentration (sum of volume fractions of blocks A and B: Ο•~A~ + Ο•~B~ = 0,9545). Our main findings are as follows: (1) The mixing is nonrandom even in th

Nonfouling biomaterials based on polyeth
✍ J. Tan; J. L. Brash πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 363 KB

## Abstract Three novel polyethylene oxide‐containing amphiphilic triblock copolymers (PEO‐PU‐PEO) with PEO MWs 550, 2000, and 5000, were blended with a segmented polyurethane (PU). It was expected that the block copolymers would act as surface modifiers to produce surfaces rich in PEO. The solid s

Toughening and phase separation behavior
✍ Kap Jin Kim; Dae Seong Hong; Amiya Ratan Tripathy; Thein Kyu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 331 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We have prepared in situ molded products of morphologically different nylon 6/polyethylene glycol (PEG) copolymers and their blends via anionic polymerization of -caprolactam in the presence of several kinds of PEG derivatives using sodium caprolactamate as a catalyst and carbamoyl caprolactam deriv