๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Supreme Court Declines To Adopt Prudent-Investment Rule

โœ Scribed by Batla, Raymond J.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Weight
258 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0743-5665

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


On January 1 1,1989, in a nearly unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that no single utility ratesetting methodology is mandated by the Constitution, so long as the state's methodology does not result in unjust or unreasonable rates. Thus, the Court affirmed a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court holding that states have the right toprevent utilities from recovering capital investments that are found prudent and reasonable when made, but that are not ultimately placed in utility service (Duquesne Light Company v. Barasch). '


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Supreme court refuses to hear take-or-pa
โœ Batla, Raymond J. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 143 KB

## I won't spend any spuce on the notion that by signing a sixty -day firm, open-uccess, transportation agreement, the pipeline should be automatically binding ifselffor life.