๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Suppression of tumorigenicity by the cell-cycle-dependent control of cellular differentiation and proliferation

โœ Scribed by John J. Wille Jr.; Robert E. Scott


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1986
Tongue
French
Weight
790 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The experiments described in this report were designed to determine if suppression of tumorigenicity can be mediated by cell-cycle-dependent mechanisms that control cellular differentiation and/or proliferation in mesenchymal stem cells of the 3T3 T type. These cells were employed because they possess distinct, well-characterized cell-cycle-dependent mechanisms to control both cellular differentiation and proliferation. To achieve our goal we developed by non-mutagenic procedures 23 clonal variants of 3T3 T stem cells that expressed one of 4 distinct phenotypes for the regulation of cellular differentiation and proliferation. Six clones expressed combined defects in the control of differentiation and proliferation; 6 expressed intact mechanisms t o control proliferation but defects in the control of differentiation; and 3 expressed intact mechanisms to control differentiation but defects in the control of proliferation. Finally, 8 clones expressed no detectable phenotypic defects in the control of either differentiation or proliferation. Once isolated and characterized, each of these clones was assayed for i t s tumorigenic potential. The results establish that clones which express combined defects in the control of differentiation and proliferation are highly tumorigenic. By contrast, tumorigenicity is markedly suppressed in clones that maintain the ability to control their proliferation or their differentiation. Furthermore, clones that maintained the ability to control both proliferation and differentiation showed no evidence of tumorigenicity. These data are interpreted t o suggest that stringently regulated control of cellular differentiation and/or proliferation can act as a cancer suppressor mechanism.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Control of neuroblastoma cell proliferat
โœ Talia Hahn; Reuven Or; Gernot Bruchelt; Lea Malach; Yocheved Karov; Beatriz Lifs ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 740 KB

lstoma Cell Proliferation and 'urnan Bone Marrow BACKGROUND. Neuroblastoma (NB) is one of the few tumors known to undergo spontaneous regression. Its progression, however, often leads to bone marrow (BM) metastasis. Proliferation and differentiation of human NB cells may be regulated in vitro by a v

At the crossroads of differentiation and
โœ Stephen Klusza; Wu-Min Deng ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 596 KB

## Abstract Here, we discuss the findings to date about genes and pathways required for regulation of somatic follicleโ€cell proliferation and differentiation during __Drosophila__ oogenesis and demonstrate how loss of these genes contributes to the tumorigenic potential of mutant cells. Follicle ce

The suppression of cellular proliferatio
โœ Delano V. Young; Michael C. Dean; Delano V. Young ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1980 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 692 KB

## Abstract Glucocorticosteroids, when added two hours after cell plating to SV40โ€transformed, 3T3 mouse fibroblasts in low serum (0.3%v/v), biotinโ€supplemented medium, suppress cellular proliferation by 24 hours. While some cell death probably occurs, the growth inhibition is not primarily due to