๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Supervisee Empowerment: Does Gender Make a Difference?

โœ Scribed by DARCY HAAG GRANELLO; PATRICIA M. BEAMISH; TOM E. DAVIS


Publisher
American Counseling Association
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
798 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0011-0035

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This study used a content analysis of audiotapes of clinical supervisory sessions to examine the effect of supervisee gender on the influence strategies used in the counseling clinical supervisory dyad.

Counseling supervision has been conceptualized as an influence process in which supervisors use personal attributes and professional techniques to facilitate change in the supervisee (Robyak. Goodyear, & Range. 1987; Strong & Matross, 1973). The use of these influence strategies by supervisors may have either a facilitative or an inhibitory effect on the supervisee's personal and professional development. Supervisors have an ethical responsibility to provide an environment that will enhance supervisees' skills and allow supervisees to devise effective strategies for working with clients (American Association of Counseling and Development [AACD], 1990;. Developmental models of supervision suggest that the goal of supervision is to allow supervisees to proceed through a progression of developmental stages and tasks and to establish a therapist identity of their own, replacing an external supervisor with an internal one (Blocher. 1983; Loganbill, Hardy, & Delworth. 1982; Stoltenberg. 1981; Watkins. 1992). Conoley (1994) called this "supervision as empowerment" (p. 48). Hawkins and Shohet (1989) claimed that one of the aims of supervision is to


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Landcare in Australia: Does it Make a Di
โœ Allan Curtis; Terry De Lacy ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 233 KB

Victorian landcare groups are increasingly seen as the key element of an emerging Australian success story. The assumptions underlying landcare are that limited funding of group activity will produce more aware, informed, skilled and adaptive resource managers with a stronger stewardship ethic, will

When does a difference make a difference
โœ Richard H. Dana; P. R. Whatley ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 542 KB

The group difference MMPI literature relevant to African-Americans was reexamined for major methodological issues including the criteria used for ethnichacia1 group membership and socioeconomic status. These issues are of sufficient magnitude to question the traditional scientific methods used in MM