It has been proved that if the diameter D of a digraph G satisfies D Յ 2ᐉ Ϫ 2, where ᐉ is a parameter which can be thought of as a generalization of the girth of a graph, then G is superconnected. Analogously, if D Յ 2ᐉ Ϫ 1, then G is edge-superconnected. In this paper, we studied some similar condi
Superconnected digraphs and graphs with small conditional diameters
✍ Scribed by C. Balbuena; J. Fàbrega; X. Marcote; I. Pelayo
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 179 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0028-3045
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Recently, it was proved that if the diameter D of a graph G is small enough in comparison with its girth, then G is maximally connected and that a similar result also holds for digraphs. More precisely, if the diameter D of a digraph G satisfies D 5 21 -1, then G has maximum connectivity ( K = 6 ) .
## Abstract MacGillivray and Seyffarth (J Graph Theory 22 (1996), 213–229) proved that planar graphs of diameter two have domination number at most three and planar graphs of diameter three have domination number at most ten. They also give examples of planar graphs of diameter four having arbitrar
denote the set of all m × n {0, 1}-matrices with row sum vector R and column sum vector S. Suppose A(R, S) ] ". The interchange graph G(R, S) of A(R, S) was defined by Brualdi in 1980. It is the graph with all matrices in A(R, S) as its vertices and two matrices are adjacent provided they differ by
A simple argument by Hedman shows that the diameter of a clique graph G differs by at most one from that of K(G), its clique graph. Hedman described examples of a graph G such that diam(K(G)) = diam(G) + 1 and asked in general about the existence of graphs such that diam(K i (G)) = diam(G) + i. Exam