𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Summer mood in winter depressives: Validation of a structured interview

✍ Scribed by Namni Goel; Michael Terman; Jiuan Su Terman; Janet B.W. Williams


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
74 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
1091-4269

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Two structured interviews, the Hypomania Interview Guide (Including Hyperthymia), for Seasonal Affective Disorder (HIGH-SAD) and its successor, the Hypomania Interview Guide (Including Hyperthymia), Retrospective Assessment Version (HIGH-R), were validated for the assessment of nondepressed spring/summer mood states in patients with DSM-III-R or Anxiety 9:83-91, 1999.

DSM-IV diagnoses of Recurrent Bipolar Disorder (I, II or NOS) or Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder (MDD; unipolar), both With Seasonal Pattern, and in normal control subjects (HIGH-SAD only). The instruments retrospectively rate the frequency and severity of DSM diagnostic criterion features as well as several non-DSM features. Both instruments had high internal consistency. Normal controls had lower total scores than unipolar patients, who had lower scores than bipolar patients. Total score classified 85-91% of patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) into the correct unipolar or bipolar group. For boundary mood cases, small subsets of features provided better classification accuracy. Based on total score, MDD patients were divided into three subgroups: euthymes (normal mood), hyperthymes (slightly elevated mood), and high-hyperthymes (scores overlapping with hypomania). With the exception of sharpened thinking, DSM items dominated patient classifications. Distinct clusters of "positive" (pleasant, agreeable) or "negative" (impairing) features described the mood states. The HIGH-R and HIGH-SAD are useful for discriminating and classifying hypomania and mania in bipolar patients, and euthymia and hyperthymia in unipolar patients. Depression and


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Validity and reliability of a new instru
✍ Andrea Fagiolini; Liliana Dell'osso; Stefano Pini; Antonella Armani; Siham Bouan 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 96 KB

## Abstract We evaluated the internal consistency, discriminant validity, inter‐rater reliability and test–retest reliability of a new instrument for the assessment of lifetime symptoms related to mood spectrum disorders: the Structured Clinical Interview for Mood Spectrum (SCI‐MOODS). We report on