✦ LIBER ✦

Summation between nearby motion signals and facilitative/inhibitory interactions between distant motion signals

✍ Scribed by Keisuke Ido; Yoshio Ohtani; Yoshimichi Ejima

Book ID: 117241553
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 611 KB
Volume: 40
Category: Article
ISSN: 0042-6989
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00199-6

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Contrast-reversing global-motion stimuli

Contrast-reversing global-motion stimuli reveal local interactions between first- and second-order motion signals

✍ Mark Edwards; Shin'ya Nishida 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 494 KB

No local cancellation between directiona

No local cancellation between directionally opposed first-order and second-order motion signals

✍ Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Andrew T Smith 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 526 KB

Inhibitory interaction between self-and

Inhibitory interaction between self-and object-motion perception: Implications for vehicle guidance

✍ Th. Probst; S. Krafczyk; D. Degner; Th. Brandt 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB

Facilitative Interactions Between Noradr

Facilitative Interactions Between Noradrenergic and Purinergic Signaling During Preconditioning of the Rat Heart

✍ Chris B. Winter; Joseph C. Cleveland; Karyn L. Butler; Dennis B. Bensard; Max B. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 321 KB

Lack of correlation between the signal-a

Lack of correlation between the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and regional wall motion abnormalities in coronary artery disease

✍ Alan Woelfel; David E. Weaver; Mark Jenkins; Linda P. Woelfel; Margaret C. Herbs 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 454 KB

Contour-based registration technique to

Contour-based registration technique to differentiate between task-activated and head motion-induced signal variations in fMRI

✍ Bharat B. Biswal; James S. Hyde 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 760 KB

## Abstract Data acquired using functional magnetic resonance imaging are often contaminated by head motion. As a result, optimal information regarding task‐induced (or resting‐state) signal changes cannot be extracted. Intensity‐based registration methods, including intensity correlation or minimu