The adsorption behavior of selenate (SeO 4 ) on goethite has been studied under a wide range of conditions. SeO 4 adsorption has been compared with the binding of SO 4 . The experimental results are interpreted in view of very recent spectroscopic work on the speciation and coordination of adsorbed
Sulfate Adsorption on Goethite
✍ Scribed by René P.J.J. Rietra; Tjisse Hiemstra; Willem H. van Riemsdijk
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 129 KB
- Volume
- 218
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9797
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Recent spectroscopic work has suggested that only one surface species of sulfate is dominant on hematite. Sulfate is therefore a very suitable anion to test and develop adsorption models for variable charge minerals. We have studied sulfate adsorption on goethite covering a large range of sulfate concentrations, surface coverages, pH values, and electrolyte concentrations. Four different techniques were used to cover the entire range of conditions. For characterization at low sulfate concentrations, below the detection limit of sulfate with ICP-AES, we used proton-sulfate titrations at constant pH. Adsorption isotherms were studied for the intermediate sulfate concentration range. Acid-base titrations in sodium sulfate and electromobility were used for high sulfate concentrations. All the data can be modeled with one adsorbed species if it is assumed that the charge of adsorbed sulfate is spatially distributed in the interface. The charge distribution of sulfate follows directly from modeling the proton-sulfate adsorption stoichiometry since this stoichiometry is independent of the intrinsic affinity constant of sulfate. The charge distribution can be related to the structure of the surface complex by use of the Pauling bond valence concept and is in accordance with the microscopic structure found by spectroscopy. The intrinsic affinity constant follows from the other measurements. Modeling of the proton-ion stoichiometry with the commonly used 2-pK models, where adsorbed ions are treated as point charges, is possible only if at least two surface species for sulfate are used.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The adsorption of copper(II) onto goethite is qualitatively difiting adsorption edge is reached. If the metal:substrate ratio ferent from that of other metal-mineral systems. At pH 5.0 the decreases below this limit there is no further shift in the adsorption isotherms are sigmoid rather than hyperb
The amount of adsorption of sulfate and Cu(II) from single- and binary-adsorbate systems on goethite were measured. All experiments were carried out with and without supporting electrolyte (0.01 M NaNO(3)) as a function of equilibrium pH (2 - 7), adsorbate concentration (0.21 - 1.57 mM), and tempera
## Citric acid promotes the adsorption of uranyl (U(VI) as UO 2+ 2 ) on goethite (α-FeOOH) at pH ≤ 5. Enhanced adsorption does not appear to follow a simple stoichiometric relationship between total citrate and total uranyl. An excess of citric acid relative to uranyl, or a high concentration of s
The influence of various types of background electrolytes (NaCl, NaNO(3), and NaClO(4)) on the proton adsorption and on the adsorption of sulfate and phosphate on goethite have been studied. Below the PZC the proton adsorption on goethite decreases in the order Cl>NO(3)>ClO(4). The decreasing proton
## substances and simple weak organic acids (3). The results The adsorption of lactate, oxalate, malonate, phthalate, and suggest that by studying well-defined weak organic acids a citrate has been determined experimentally as a function of conbetter understanding of the interactions of ill-define