<p><p>This book argues that according to <i>Metaphysics </i>Zeta, substantial forms constitute substantial being in the sensible world, and individual composites make up the basic constituents that possess this kind of being. The study explains why Aristotle provides a reexamination of substance aft
Substantial Knowledge: Aristotle's Metaphysics
โ Scribed by C. D. C. Reeve
- Publisher
- Hackett Pub Co Inc
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 343
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In this groundbreaking work, C D C Reeve uses a fundamental problem -- the Primacy Dilemma -- to explore Aristotle's metaphysics, epistemology, dialectic, philosophy of mind, and theology in a new way. At a time when Aristotle is most often studied piecemeal, Reeve attempts to see him both in detail and as a whole, so that it is from detailed analysis of hundreds of particular passages, drawn from dozens of Aristotelian treatises, and translated in full that his overall picture of Aristotle emerges. Primarily a book for philosophers and advanced students with an interest in the fundamental problems with which Aristotle is grappling, this is a clear, non-technical and engaging style will appeal to any reader eager to explore Aristotle's difficult but extraordinarily rewarding thought.
โฆ Table of Contents
Title Page......Page 4
Copyright Page......Page 5
Contents......Page 10
Introduction......Page 14
Abbreviations......Page 18
Platonism......Page 20
Scientific Knowledge......Page 37
Essence......Page 62
Being as Substance......Page 108
{erce[tible Substance......Page 134
Substance as Form......Page 153
Intelligible Substance......Page 168
Divine Substance......Page 209
The Science of Being Qua Being......Page 259
Aristotelianism......Page 310
References......Page 322
Index Locorum......Page 329
General Index......Page 338
About the Author......Page 342
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>Michael Wedin argues against the prevailing notion that Aristotle's views on the nature of reality are fundamentally inconsistent. According to Wedin's new interpretation, the difference between the early theory of the </span><span>Categories</span><span> and the later theory of the </span><sp
Michael Wedin argues against the prevailing notion that Aristotle's views on the nature of reality are fundamentally inconsistent. According to Wedin's new interpretation, the difference between the early theory of the Categories and the later theory of the Metaphysics reflects the fact that Aristot
Michael Wedin argues against the prevailing notion that Aristotle's views on the nature of reality are fundamentally inconsistent. According to Wedin's new interpretation, the difference between the early theory of the Categories and the later theory of the Metaphysics reflects the fact that Aristot