Substance and Essence in Aristotle is a close study of Aristotle's most profoundβand perplexingβtreatise: Books VII-IX of the Metaphysics. These central books, which focus on the nature of substance, have gained a deserved reputation for their difficulty, inconclusiveness, and internal inconsistency
Substance and Essence in Aristotle: An Interpretation of "Metaphysics" VII-IX
β Scribed by Charlotte Witt
- Publisher
- Cornell University Press
- Year
- 2018
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 215
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
She concludes that fundamental differences between Aristotelian and contemporary essentialist theories highlight important features of Aristotle's theory and the philosophical problems and milieu that engendered it.
β¦ Table of Contents
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1. BEING
Chapter 2. BEING AND SUBSTANCE
Chapter 3. THE METAPHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF SENSIBLE SUBSTANCES
Chapter 4. THE NATURE AND FUNCTION OF ESSENCE
Chapter 5. THE ONTOLOGICAL STATUS OF ESSENCE
Chapter 6. ARISTOTLE AND KRIPKE
INDEX
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Doing and Being confronts the problem of how to understand two central concepts of Aristotle's philosophy: energeia and dunamis. While these terms seem ambiguous between actuality/potentiality and activity/capacity, Aristotle did not intend them to be so. Through a careful and detailed reading of Me
<p><p>This book argues that according to <i>Metaphysics </i>Zeta, substantial forms constitute substantial being in the sensible world, and individual composites make up the basic constituents that possess this kind of being. The study explains why Aristotle provides a reexamination of substance aft
<span>Doing and Being </span><span>confronts the problem of how to understand two central concepts of Aristotle's philosophy: </span><span>energeia </span><span>and </span><span>dunamis</span><span>. While these terms seem ambiguous between actuality/potentiality and activity/capacity, Aristotle did
<span>Doing and Being </span><span>confronts the problem of how to understand two central concepts of Aristotle's philosophy: </span><span>energeia </span><span>and </span><span>dunamis</span><span>. While these terms seem ambiguous between actuality/potentiality and activity/capacity, Aristotle did
<p><span>Doing and Being confronts the problem of how to understand two central concepts of Aristotle's philosophy: energeia and dunamis. While these terms seem ambiguous between actuality/potentiality and activity/capacity, Aristotle did not intend them to be so. Through a careful and detailed read