Strawson has supplied a new introduction for this reissue of his modern classic, originally published in 1974. This text explores two conceptions of subject and predicate; one of which lies at the core of standard logic and another more closely relates to surface forms of natural language.
Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar
โ Scribed by P. F. Strawson
- Publisher
- Ashgate
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 131
- Edition
- 2
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Table of Contents
Copyright ......Page 2
Contents ......Page 3
Preface ......Page 5
Introduction ......Page 7
PART I: THE SUBJECT IN LOGIC ......Page 13
1. The 'Basic Combination' ......Page 15
Some formal differences ......Page 16
Spatio-temporal particulars and general concepts ......Page 23
Propositional combination: a tripartition of function ......Page 29
Formal differences explained for the basic case ......Page 30
The generalization of the form ......Page 40
An objection answered ......Page 42
What is the use of them? ......Page 47
Names and identity ......Page 55
Names in the framework of logic: proper names, variable names and descriptive names ......Page 59
General names ......Page 67
PART II: THE SUBJECT IN GENERAL ......Page 73
Essential grammar and variable grammar ......Page 75
Language-Types 1 and 2 ......Page 79
Language-Type 3: relations ......Page 82
Further minor enrichments: space-time indication ......Page 89
Special case and general function ......Page 95
Some supporting evidence ......Page 99
Modes of substantiation ......Page 103
Further matters: existence; negation; scope ......Page 106
Derivative roles and derivative elements ......Page 111
The generalization of the subject ......Page 114
The fitting in of features ......Page 122
Further questions ......Page 124
Index ......Page 127
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p><STRONG>Predicates and their Subjects</STRONG> is an in-depth study of the syntax-semantics interface focusing on the structure of the subject-predicate relation. Starting from where the author's 1983 dissertation left off, the book argues that there is syntactic constraint that clauses (small an