Abstract
Two series of poly(ether urethane)s and one series of poly(ester urethane)s were synthesized, containing, respectively, poly(oxytetramethylene) diol (PTMO) of M~n~ = 1000 and 2000 and poly(ε‐caprolactone) diol of M~n~ = 2000 as soft segments. In each series the same hard segment, i.e., 4,4′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(benzenethiohexanol)/hexane‐1,6‐diyl diisocyanate, with different content (∼ 14–72 wt %) was used. The polymers were prepared by a one‐step melt polymerization in the presence of dibutyltin dilaurate as a catalyst, at the molar ratio of NCO/OH = 1 (in the case of the polymers from PTMO of M~n~ = 1000 also at 1.05). For all polymers structures (by FTIR and X‐ray diffraction analysis) and physicochemical, thermal (by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis), and tensile properties as well as Shore A/D hardness were determined. The resulting polymers were thermoplastic materials with partially crystalline structures (except the polymer with the highest content of PTMO of M~n~ = 2000). It was found that the poly(ether urethane)s showed lower crystallinity, glass‐transition temperature (T~g~), and hardness as well as better thermal stability than the poly(ester urethane)s. Poly(ether urethane)s also exhibited higher tensile strength (up to 23.5 MPa vs. 20.3 MPa) and elongation at break (up to ∼ 1950% vs. 1200%) in comparison with the corresponding poly(ester urethane)s. Among the poly(ether urethane)s an increase in soft‐segment length was accompanied by an increase in thermal stability, tensile strength, and elongation at break, as well as a decrease in T~g~, crystallinity, and hardness. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008