The integrated theory of dynamic interpretation set out here will be a surprise to advanced researchers in linguistics. It combines classical formal semantics and modern dynamic semantics without altering the fundamental paradigm. At the bookβs core lies a pragmatically motivated notion of a dynamic
[Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy] Dynamic Semantics Volume 91 || Information Update and Support
β Scribed by Dekker, Paul J.E.
- Book ID
- 111981336
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- Dutch
- Weight
- 313 KB
- Edition
- 2012
- Category
- Article
- ISBN
- 9400748698
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The integrated theory of dynamic interpretation set out here will be a surprise to advanced researchers in linguistics. It combines classical formal semantics and modern dynamic semantics without altering the fundamental paradigm. At the bookβs core lies a pragmatically motivated notion of a dynamic conjunction of meanings, an idea that is worked out in full formal detail. This is applied to linguistic phenomena that involve anaphora, quantification and modality. The author demonstrates that in each area of application existing data can be neatly combined with new dynamic insights, but more importantly, there is a genuine further pay-off: the work generates treatments of phenomena that were not initially intended, with functional readings of pronouns and quantifiers, βHob-Nobβ sentences, and insights into what we now call βPierceβs Puzzleβ. The outcome of a decade of work by the Amsterdam School of dynamic semantics, this volume condenses and reflects upon a vital body of research.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The integrated theory of dynamic interpretation set out here will be a surprise to advanced researchers in linguistics. It combines classical formal semantics and modern dynamic semantics without altering the fundamental paradigm. At the bookβs core lies a pragmatically motivated notion of a dynamic
This anthology of papers analyzes a range of specificity markers found in natural languages. It reflects the fact that despite intensive research into these markers, the vast differences between the markers across languages and even within single languages have been less acknowledged. Commonly regar