In this work, impact copolymer polypropylene (ICPP) was fractionated into 4 fractions. ICPP and the 4 fractions were studied using Fourier transform infrared and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. The results demonstrate that fraction A is ethylene-propylene rubber, fraction B is ethylene-pro
Structure and properties of impact copolymer polypropylene. II. Phase structure and crystalline morphology
β Scribed by Cai Hongjun; Luo Xiaolie; Chen Xiangxu; Ma Dezhu; Wang Jianmin; Tan Hongsheng
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 473 KB
- Volume
- 71
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-8995
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this work, an impact copolymer polypropylene (ICPP) was separated into 4 fractions, A, B, C, and D. The phase structure, thermal behavior, and crystalline morphology of the ICPP and its 4 fractions were studied thoroughly using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and polarized light microscopy (PLM). Results of SEM and DMA show that ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) and part of the ethylene-propylene segmented copolymer disperse as toughening particles in the ICPP. The size and size distribution of these particles are determined by chain structure of the fractions of ICPP. From fraction A to fraction D, the morphology changes from noncrystalline to semicrystalline gradually, as shown by DSC. DSC results also indicate that thermal behavior of the ICPP agrees greatly with its chain structure. PLM demonstrates that it is difficult for the ICPP to grow perfect spherulites, that is, partially, because the matrix of ICPP, fraction D, has defects in its macromolecular chain. Another cause is that there is a good compatible structure in the ICPP and so the noncrystalline component (including all fractions) hinders the growth of the spherulite.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The structure and mechanical properties of the injection-molded products for the binary blends composed of an isotactic polypropylene (PP) and a rubbery ethylene-1-hexene copolymer (EHR) were studied. The following two types of blends were employed: one is the incompatible blend of PP and ethylene-r
The mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene/wood flour (PP/WF) composites with different impact modifiers and maleated polypropylene (MAPP) as a compatibilizer have been studied. Two different ethylene/propylene/diene terpolymers (EPDM) and one maleated styrene-ethylene/butylene-styren