Structure and definability in general bounded arithmetic theories
✍ Scribed by Chris Pollett
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 399 KB
- Volume
- 100
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0168-0072
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The bounded arithmetic theories R i 2 ; S i 2 , and T i 2 are closely connected with complexity theory. This paper is motivated by the questions: what are the b i+1 -deÿnable multifunctions of R i 2 ? and when is one theory conservative over another? To answer these questions we consider theories Ri 2 ; Ŝi 2 , and T i 2 where induction is restricted to prenex formulas. We also deÿne T i; 2 which has induction up to the 0 or 1-ary L2-terms in the set . We show Ŝi 2 = S i 2 and T i 2 = T i 2 and
We show that the ˆ b i+1 -multifunctions of T i; 2 are FP p i (wit; | |) and that those of Ri 2 are FP p i (wit; loglog). For ˆ b i+k+2 -deÿnability we get FP p i+k+1
(wit; 1) for all these theories. Write 2 ˙ for the set of terms 2 min('(x);|t(x)|) where ' is a ÿnite product of terms in and t ∈ L2. We prove T i;2 ˙ 2 4 B( ˆ b i+1 ) T i+1; 2 and we show T i; 2 ˆ b i+1 -IND provided ⊆ O2(|id|). This gives a proof theoretic proof that S i 2 b i+1 -LIND and Ri 2
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We study, within the framework of intuitionistic logic, two well‐known general results of (classical logic) bounded arithmetic. Firstly, Parikh's theorem on the existence of bounding terms for the provably total functions. Secondly, the result which states that adding the scheme of boun
In Section 1 of present paper we construct a formula 'n(A) of Presburger arithmetic (integers with addition and order) with additional n-ary predicate variable A. This formula is true if and only if predicate A is deÿnable in Presburger arithmetic (Theorem 2). This formula is used to prove the foll
We study search problems and reducibilities between them with known or potential relevance to bounded arithmetic theories. Our primary objective is to understand the sets of low complexity consequences (esp. Σ b 1 or Σ b 2 ) of theories S i 2 and T i 2 for a small i, ideally in a rather strong sense
## Abstract It is shown that the feasibly constructive arithmetic theory IPV does not prove (double negation of) LMIN(NP), unless the polynomial hierarchy CPV‐provably collapses. It is proved that PV plus (double negation of) LMIN(NP) intuitionistically proves PIND(coNP). It is observed that PV + P