𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Stress-ulcer prophylaxis for general medical patients: A review of the evidence

✍ Scribed by Todd Janicki; Scott Stewart


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
103 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
1553-5592

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric stress ulceration and bleeding are common occurrences in the critically ill and prophylactic acid‐suppression is used almost universally in this population. Evidence suggests that general medical patients hospitalized outside of the intensive care unit often receive similar therapy.

PURPOSE

To determine how frequently general medical patients are prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis and what evidence exists for doing so.

DATA SOURCE

The MEDLINE database (1966 to October 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (4th Quarter 2005), and the bibliographies of selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that contained significant data about either the frequency of use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in general medical patients or gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in patients given prophylaxis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary author extracted prevalence and outcome data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive studies suggest that 20–25% of general medical patients receive acid suppression for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the absence of presumed (but not established) risk factors for bleeding. Only two randomized, controlled trials evaluated the effects of prophylaxis in this population. The first found a reduction in clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from 6% (3 of 48) with placebo to zero (n = 52) with magaldrate. The second found a reduction in clinically significant bleeding from 3% (2 of 70) with sucralfate to zero (n = 74) with cimetidine.

CONCLUSION

A significant number of general medical patients are prescribed acid‐suppressive therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The literature provides only sparse guidance on this issue with two randomized trials showing a possible benefit for prophylaxis. Further study is needed. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2007;2:86–92. Β© 2007 Society of Hospital Medicine.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


How complete is the evidence for thrombo
✍ Gregory M. Bump; Madhavi Dandu; Samuel R. Kaufman; Kaveh G. Shojania; Scott A. F πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 461 KB

## Abstract ## OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thromboembolism. Despite recommendations, multiple studies demonstrate underutilization. Factors contributing to underutilization include uncertainty that prophylaxis re